Causal EpiNets: Precision-corrected Bounds on Individual Treatment Effects using Epistemic Neural Networks
Abstract
Individual treatment effects are not point-identified from data. The Probability of Necessity and Sufficiency (PNS) circumvents this limitation by characterizing individual-level causality through intersection bounds derived from combined experimental and observational data. In finite samples, however, standard plug-in estimators systematically fail: they violate structural probability constraints and suffer from extremum bias induced by max-min operators, yielding spuriously narrow intervals. We propose a neural framework for finite-sample PNS estimation that resolves both pathologies. We introduce an anchored neural architecture that guarantees structural constraint satisfaction by construction. To correct extremum bias, we employ precision-corrected intersection-bound inference, leveraging Epistemic Neural Networks for scalable, high-dimensional uncertainty quantification. Empirical evaluations confirm that this approach maintains nominal coverage and exact constraint validity in high-dimensional regimes where standard estimators systematically undercover.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2605.07065,
title = {Causal EpiNets: Precision-corrected Bounds on Individual Treatment Effects using Epistemic Neural Networks},
author = {Gandharv Patil and Keyi Tang and Raquel Aoki and Leo Guelman},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.07065},
year = {2026}
}