Can You Link Up With Treewidth?
Abstract
In a fundamental paper in parameterized complexity theory, Marx [ToC '10] constructed -vertex graphs of maximum degree such that time algorithms for detecting colorful -subgraphs would refute the Exponential-Time Hypothesis (ETH). This result is widely used to obtain almost-tight conditional lower bounds for parameterized problems under ETH. We give a new and fully self-contained proof of this result that further simplifies a recent work by Karthik et al. [SOSA 2024]. In our proof, we introduce a novel graph parameter of independent interest, the linkage capacity , and show that detecting colorful -subgraphs in time refutes ETH. Then, we use a simple construction of communication networks credited to Bene\v{s} to obtain -vertex graphs of maximum degree and linkage capacity , avoiding arguments involving expander graphs, which were required in previous papers. We also show that every graph of treewidth has linkage capacity , thus recovering a stronger result shown by Marx [ToC '10] with a simplified proof. Additionally, we obtain new tight lower bounds on the complexity of colorful subgraph detection for certain types of patterns by analyzing their linkage capacity: We prove that almost all -vertex graphs of polynomial average degree for have linkage capacity , which implies tight lower bounds for finding such patterns . As an application of these results, we also obtain tight lower bounds for counting small induced subgraphs having a fixed property , improving bounds from, e.g., [Roth et al., FOCS 2020].
Cite
@article{arxiv.2410.02606,
title = {Can You Link Up With Treewidth?},
author = {Radu Curticapean and Simon Döring and Daniel Neuen and Jiaheng Wang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02606},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
33 pages, 4 figure, full version of a paper accepted at STACS 2025; second version improves the presentation of the results