English

Can Early Dark Energy Explain EDGES?

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2018-08-27 v2

Abstract

The Experiment to Detect the Global Epoch of Reionization Signature (EDGES) collaboration has reported the detection of an absorption feature in the sky-averaged spectrum at 78\approx 78 MHz. This signal has been interpreted as the absorption of cosmic microwave background (CMB) photons at redshifts 15z2015 \lesssim z \lesssim 20 by the 21cm hyperfine transition of neutral hydrogen, whose temperature is expected to be coupled to the gas temperature by the Wouthuysen-Field effect during this epoch. Because the gas is colder than the CMB, the 21cm signal is seen in absorption. However, the absorption depth reported by EDGES is more than twice the maximal value expected in the standard cosmological model, at 3.8σ\approx 3.8\sigma significance. Here, we propose an explanation for this depth based on "early dark energy" (EDE), a scenario in which an additional component with equation of state w=1w=-1 contributes to the cosmological energy density at early times, before decaying rapidly at a critical redshift, zcz_c. For 20zc100020 \lesssim z_c \lesssim 1000, the accelerated expansion due to the EDE can produce an earlier decoupling of the gas temperature from the radiation temperature than that in the standard model, giving the gas additional time to cool adiabatically before the first luminous sources form. We show that the EDE scenario can successfully explain the large amplitude of the EDGES signal. However, such models are strongly ruled out by observations of the CMB temperature power spectrum. Moreover, the EDE models needed to explain the EDGES signal exacerbate the current tension in low- and high-redshift measurements of the Hubble constant. We conclude that non-finely-tuned modifications of the background cosmology are unlikely to explain the EDGES signal while remaining consistent with other cosmological observations.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1803.07555,
  title  = {Can Early Dark Energy Explain EDGES?},
  author = {J. Colin Hill and Eric J. Baxter},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.07555},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

5 pages, 3 figures; v2: 5+epsilon pages, added additional purely geometric constraint to Fig. 3, results unchanged, matches published version

R2 v1 2026-06-23T00:59:15.149Z