Brexit Means Brexit: Selection Bias, Echo Chambers, and Entrenched Opinion on Reddit
Abstract
Political polarisation on structured discussion platforms such as Reddit differs fundamentally from that on broadcast platforms such as Twitter/X, yet most prior work targets the latter. We present an end-to-end framework for measuring and analysing polarisation dynamics, applied to the r/Brexit subreddit (871K submissions, November 2015 -- February 2021). We construct r/Brexit, a crowd-annotated stance dataset of 5,895 labelled submissions (inter-annotator agreement = 0.804), and train a domain-adapted BERT classifier. We introduce a continuous polarity metric that replaces discrete stance categories, revealing fine-grained opinion spectra across 27 politically-defined periods. Our analysis yields three key findings: (a) future stance prediction is confounded by survivorship bias: persuadable users disengage, and those who remain are already entrenched; (b) echo chambers are quantifiably dominant, with nearly 40% of interactions between like-minded users; (c) user current polarity is the dominant predictor of future polarity, with echo-chamber immersion as the secondary predictive signal. These findings reveal that Reddit's partisan core is entrenched by self-selection, not softened by cross-cutting exposure.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2603.07509,
title = {Brexit Means Brexit: Selection Bias, Echo Chambers, and Entrenched Opinion on Reddit},
author = {Marian-Andrei Rizoiu and Duy Khuu and Andrew Law and Christine Largeron},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.07509},
year = {2026}
}