English

Branching laws on the metaplectic cover of ${\rm GL}_{2}$

Representation Theory 2014-06-24 v1

Abstract

Representation theory of pp-adic groups naturally comes in the study of automorphic forms and one way to understand representations of a group is by restricting to its nice subgroups. D. Prasad studied the restriction for pairs (GL2(E),GL2(F))({\rm GL}_{2}(E), {\rm GL}_{2}(F)) and (GL2(E),DF×)({\rm GL}_{2}(E), D_{F}^{\times}) where E/FE/F is a quadratic equation and DFD_{F} is the unique quaternion division algebra, and DF×GL2(E)D_{F}^{\times} \hookrightarrow {\rm GL}_{2}(E). Prasad proved a multiplicity one result and a `dichotomy' relating the restriction for the pairs (GL2(E),GL2(F))({\rm GL}_{2}(E), {\rm GL}_{2}(F)) and (GL2(E),DF×)({\rm GL}_{2}(E), D_{F}^{\times}) involving the Jacquet-Langlands correspondence. We study a restriction problem involving covering groups. In an analogy to the case of Prasad, we consider pairs (GL2(E)~,GL2(F))(\widetilde{{\rm GL}_{2}(E)}, {\rm GL}_{2}(F)) and (GL2(E)~,DF×)(\widetilde{{\rm GL}_{2}(E)}, D_{F}^{\times}) where GL2(E)~\widetilde{{\rm GL}_{2}(E)} is the C×\mathbb{C}^{\times}-metaplectic covering of GL2(E){\rm GL}_{2}(E). We do not have multiplicity one in this case but there is an analogue of dichotomy.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1406.5548,
  title  = {Branching laws on the metaplectic cover of ${\rm GL}_{2}$},
  author = {Shiv Prakash Patel},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5548},
  year   = {2014}
}

Comments

Ph. D. Thesis