English

Bounds on entanglement assisted source-channel coding via the Lovasz theta number and its variants

Quantum Physics 2014-10-28 v3 Combinatorics

Abstract

We study zero-error entanglement assisted source-channel coding (communication in the presence of side information). Adapting a technique of Beigi, we show that such coding requires existence of a set of vectors satisfying orthogonality conditions related to suitably defined graphs GG and HH. Such vectors exist if and only if ϑ(G)ϑ(H)\vartheta(\overline{G}) \le \vartheta(\overline{H}) where ϑ\vartheta represents the Lov\'asz number. We also obtain similar inequalities for the related Schrijver ϑ\vartheta^- and Szegedy ϑ+\vartheta^+ numbers. These inequalities reproduce several known bounds and also lead to new results. We provide a lower bound on the entanglement assisted cost rate. We show that the entanglement assisted independence number is bounded by the Schrijver number: α(G)ϑ(G)\alpha^*(G) \le \vartheta^-(G). Therefore, we are able to disprove the conjecture that the one-shot entanglement-assisted zero-error capacity is equal to the integer part of the Lov\'asz number. Beigi introduced a quantity β\beta as an upper bound on α\alpha^* and posed the question of whether β(G)=ϑ(G)\beta(G) = \lfloor \vartheta(G) \rfloor. We answer this in the affirmative and show that a related quantity is equal to ϑ(G)\lceil \vartheta(G) \rceil. We show that a quantity χvect(G)\chi_{\textrm{vect}}(G) recently introduced in the context of Tsirelson's conjecture is equal to ϑ+(G)\lceil \vartheta^+(\overline{G}) \rceil. In an appendix we investigate multiplicativity properties of Schrijver's and Szegedy's numbers, as well as projective rank.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1310.7120,
  title  = {Bounds on entanglement assisted source-channel coding via the Lovasz theta number and its variants},
  author = {Toby Cubitt and Laura Mancinska and David Roberson and Simone Severini and Dan Stahlke and Andreas Winter},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.7120},
  year   = {2014}
}

Comments

Fixed proof of multiplicativity; more connections to prior work in conclusion; many changes in exposition