Boundary-Aware Quantization: Finite-Scale Decision Geometry of Neural Classifiers
Abstract
We measured quantization-induced decision-boundary changes using local logit-margin radii, first-order boundary displacement, normal variation, slice-boundary Jaccard distance, grid prediction changes, multiclass junction counts, and low-margin boundary-band flips. On the digits benchmark, 8-bit weight quantization preserved all test labels while producing boundary-mask Jaccard on the PCA slice; at 4 bits, accuracy remained , while boundary Jaccard rose to and median local boundary shift reached . Interpolation between adjacent quantization levels localized the visible reconfigurations at multiclass junctions, with 12, 34, and 17 triple-junction cells in the selected transitions. Calibration-to-test stopping reduced the digits held-out flip rate from to and boundary Jaccard from to ; the same stopping rule also reduced flips on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST. On official CIFAR-10 subsets, PTQ-W selected by accuracy gave 6-bit flip and boundary Jaccard , whereas boundary-aware stopping selected 8-bit flip and boundary Jaccard . On full CIFAR-10 with three seeds, 6-bit PTQ-W lost accuracy relative to float, changed of held-out decisions, and changed of low-margin boundary-band decisions. A fixed-bit boundary-gap rounding term changed the trade-off at 4 bits by reducing boundary Jaccard from to and boundary-band pair-order flip from to , with an accuracy trade-off; the 3-bit stress test exposed the tuning limit of this surrogate. Calibration boundary Jaccard predicted held-out boundary Jaccard across PTQ-W and optimized rounding variants with --.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2607.01478,
title = {Boundary-Aware Quantization: Finite-Scale Decision Geometry of Neural Classifiers},
author = {O. M. Kiselev},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.01478},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
7 pages, 2 figures, 6 tables