English

Black hole superradiant instability from ultralight spin-2 fields

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology 2020-06-04 v3 High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena High Energy Physics - Phenomenology High Energy Physics - Theory

Abstract

Ultralight bosonic fields are compelling dark-matter candidates and arise in a variety of beyond-Standard-Model scenarios. These fields can tap energy and angular momentum from spinning black holes through superradiant instabilities, during which a macroscopic bosonic condensate develops around the black hole. Striking features of this phenomenon include gaps in the spin-mass distribution of astrophysical black holes and a continuous gravitational-wave~(GW) signal emitted by the condensate. So far these processes have been studied in great detail for scalar fields and, more recently, for vector fields. Here we take an important step forward in the black-hole superradiance program by computing, analytically, the instability time scale, the direct GW emission, and the stochastic background, in the case of massive tensor (i.e., spin-22) fields. Our analysis is valid for any black hole spin and for small boson masses. The instability of massive spin-22 fields shares some properties with the scalar and vector cases, but its phenomenology is much richer, for example there exist multiple modes with comparable instability time scales, and the dominant GW signal is hexadecapolar rather than quadrupolar. Electromagnetic and GW observations of spinning black holes in the mass range M(1,1010)MM\in(1,10^{10})M_\odot can constrain the mass of a putative spin-22 field in the range 1022mbc2/eV101010^{-22} \lesssim m_b\,{\rm c^2/eV} \lesssim 10^{-10}. For 1017mbc2/eV101510^{-17}\lesssim m_b\,{\rm c^2/eV}\lesssim 10^{-15}, the space mission LISA could detect the continuous GW signal for sources at redshift z=20z=20, or even larger.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2002.04055,
  title  = {Black hole superradiant instability from ultralight spin-2 fields},
  author = {Richard Brito and Sara Grillo and Paolo Pani},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.04055},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

13 pages, 4 Figures; v3: minor changes to match published version in Physical Review Letters

R2 v1 2026-06-23T13:37:28.164Z