English

Black hole-neutron star mergers with massive neutron stars in numerical relativity

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2024-11-22 v2 General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Abstract

We study the merger of black hole-neutron star (BH-NS) binaries in numerical relativity, focusing on the properties of the remnant disk and the ejecta, varying the mass of compactness of the NS and the mass and spin of the BH. We find that within the precision of our numerical simulations, the remnant disk mass and ejecta mass normalized by the NS baryon mass (M^rem\hat{M}_{\rm{rem}} and M^eje\hat{M}_{\rm{eje}}, respectively), and the cutoff frequency fcutf_{\rm{cut}} normalized by the initial total gravitational mass of the system at infinite separation approximately agree among the models with the same NS compactness CNS=MNS/RNSC_{\rm{NS}}=M_{\rm{NS}}/R_{\rm{NS}}, mass ratio Q=MBH/MNSQ=M_{\rm{BH}}/M_{\rm{NS}}, and dimensionless BH spin χBH\chi_{\rm{BH}} irrespective of the NS mass MNSM_{\rm{NS}} in the range of 1.0921.092--1.691M1.691\,M_\odot. This result shows that the merger outcome depends sensitively on QQ, χBH\chi_{\rm BH}, and CNSC_{\rm{NS}} but only weekly on MNSM_{\rm{NS}}. This justifies the approach of studying the dependence of NS tidal disruptions on the NS compactness by fixing the NS mass but changing the EOS. We further perform simulations with massive NSs of MNS=1.8MM_{\rm{NS}}=1.8M_{\odot}, and compare our results of M^rem\hat{M}_{\rm{rem}} and M^eje\hat{M}_{\rm{eje}} with those given by existing fitting formulas to test their robustness for more compact NSs. We find that the fitting formulas obtained in the previous studies are accurate within the numerical errors assumed, while our results also suggest that further improvement is possible by systematically performing more precise numerical simulations.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2404.18714,
  title  = {Black hole-neutron star mergers with massive neutron stars in numerical relativity},
  author = {Shichuan Chen and Luohan Wang and Kota Hayashi and Kyohei Kawaguchi and Kenta Kiuchi and Masaru Shibata},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.18714},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

19 pages, 14 figures