Bi-Factorial Preference Optimization: Balancing Safety-Helpfulness in Language Models
Abstract
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on human preferences, typically through reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), has proven successful in enhancing their capabilities. However, ensuring the safety of LLMs during fine-tuning remains a critical concern, and mitigating the potential conflicts in safety and helpfulness is costly in RLHF. To address this issue, we propose a supervised learning framework called Bi-Factorial Preference Optimization (BFPO), which re-parameterizes a joint RLHF objective of both safety and helpfulness into a single supervised learning objective. In supervised optimization, a labeling function is used to capture the global preferences ranking to balance both safety and helpfulness. To evaluate BFPO, we develop a benchmark that includes comprehensive discriminative and generative tasks for helpfulness and harmlessness. The results indicate that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches in both safety and helpfulness. Moreover, BFPO achieves the same level of safety as methods that heavily rely on human labor with less than 10\% of the computational resources and human prompting and annotation process. The training recipes can be found here: https://github.com/wx-zhang/bfpo.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2408.15313,
title = {Bi-Factorial Preference Optimization: Balancing Safety-Helpfulness in Language Models},
author = {Wenxuan Zhang and Philip H. S. Torr and Mohamed Elhoseiny and Adel Bibi},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15313},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
The paper has been accepted in ICLR 2025 as spotlight presentation