English

Better Data Labelling with EMBLEM (and how that Impacts Defect Prediction)

Software Engineering 2020-04-08 v3

Abstract

Standard automatic methods for recognizing problematic development commits can be greatly improved via the incremental application of human+artificial expertise. In this approach, called EMBLEM, an AI tool first explore the software development process to label commits that are most problematic. Humans then apply their expertise to check those labels (perhaps resulting in the AI updating the support vectors within their SVM learner). We recommend this human+AI partnership, for several reasons. When a new domain is encountered, EMBLEM can learn better ways to label which comments refer to real problems. Also, in studies with 9 open source software projects, labelling via EMBLEM's incremental application of human+AI is at least an order of magnitude cheaper than existing methods (\approx eight times). Further, EMBLEM is very effective. For the data sets explored here, EMBLEM better labelling methods significantly improved Popt20P_{opt}20 and G-scores performance in nearly all the projects studied here.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1905.01719,
  title  = {Better Data Labelling with EMBLEM (and how that Impacts Defect Prediction)},
  author = {Huy Tu and Zhe Yu and Tim Menzies},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.01719},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

17 pages, 2 pages references, submitted for TSE journal

R2 v1 2026-06-23T08:57:28.454Z