LLM agents are increasingly expected to function as general-purpose systems capable of resolving open-ended user requests. While existing benchmarks focus on domain-aware environments for developing specialized agents, evaluating general-purpose agents requires more realistic settings that challenge them to operate across multiple skills and tools within a unified environment. We introduce General AgentBench, a benchmark that provides such a unified framework for evaluating general LLM agents across search, coding, reasoning, and tool-use domains. Using General AgentBench, we systematically study test-time scaling behaviors under sequential scaling (iterative interaction) and parallel scaling (sampling multiple trajectories). Evaluation of ten leading LLM agents reveals a substantial performance degradation when moving from domain-specific evaluations to this general-agent setting. Moreover, we find that neither scaling methodology yields effective performance improvements in practice, due to two fundamental limitations: context ceiling in sequential scaling and verification gap in parallel scaling. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/cxcscmu/General-AgentBench.
@article{arxiv.2602.18998,
title = {Benchmark Test-Time Scaling of General LLM Agents},
author = {Xiaochuan Li and Ryan Ming and Pranav Setlur and Abhijay Paladugu and Andy Tang and Hao Kang and Shuai Shao and Rong Jin and Chenyan Xiong},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.18998},
year = {2026}
}