English

Barcoding Invariants and Their Equivalent Discriminating Power

Algebraic Topology 2025-04-16 v2 Representation Theory

Abstract

The persistence barcode (equivalently, the persistence diagram), which can be obtained from the interval decomposition of a persistence module, plays a pivotal role in applications of persistent homology. For multi-parameter persistent homology, which lacks a complete discrete invariant, and where persistence modules are no longer always interval decomposable, many alternative invariants have been proposed. Many of these invariants are akin to persistence barcodes, in that they assign (possibly signed) multisets of intervals. Furthermore, to any interval decomposable module, those invariants assign the multiset of intervals that correspond to its summands. Naturally, identifying the relationships among invariants of this type, or ordering them by their discriminating power, is a fundamental question. To address this, we formalize the notion of barcoding invariants and compare their discriminating powers. Notably, this formalization enables us to prove that all barcoding invariants with the same basis possess equivalent discriminating power. One implication of our result is that introducing a new barcoding invariant does not add any value in terms of its generic discriminating power, even if the new invariant is distinct from the existing barcoding invariants. This suggests the need for a more flexible and adaptable comparison framework for barcoding invariants. Along the way, we generalize several recent results on the discriminative power of invariants for poset representations within our unified framework.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2412.04995,
  title  = {Barcoding Invariants and Their Equivalent Discriminating Power},
  author = {Emerson G. Escolar and Woojin Kim},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04995},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

33 pages, notable changes: (1) Further clarified how this work relates to previous results, with additional remarks and examples. (2) Added an alternative proof of Theorem 3.14. (3) Now we explicitly distinguish between 'equal' and 'equivalent' discriminating power

R2 v1 2026-06-28T20:25:33.778Z