Backdoor attacks are a significant threat to large language models (LLMs), often embedded via public checkpoints, yet existing defenses rely on impractical assumptions about trigger settings. To address this challenge, we propose \ourmethod, a defense framework that requires no prior knowledge of trigger settings. \ourmethod is based on the key observation that when deliberately injecting known backdoors into an already-compromised model, both existing unknown and newly injected backdoors aggregate in the representation space. \ourmethod leverages this through a two-stage process: \textbf{first}, aggregating backdoor representations by injecting known triggers, and \textbf{then}, performing recovery fine-tuning to restore benign outputs. Extensive experiments across multiple LLM architectures demonstrate that: (I) \ourmethod reduces the average Attack Success Rate to 4.41\% across multiple benchmarks, outperforming existing baselines by 28.1\%∼69.3\%↑. (II) Clean accuracy and utility are preserved within 0.5\% of the original model, ensuring negligible impact on legitimate tasks. (III) The defense generalizes across different types of backdoors, confirming its robustness in practical deployment scenarios.
@article{arxiv.2510.10265,
title = {Backdoor Collapse: Eliminating Unknown Threats via Known Backdoor Aggregation in Language Models},
author = {Liang Lin and Miao Yu and Moayad Aloqaily and Zhenhong Zhou and Kun Wang and Linsey Pang and Prakhar Mehrotra and Qingsong Wen},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.10265},
year = {2026}
}