English

Average Stability is Invariant to Data Preconditioning. Implications to Exp-concave Empirical Risk Minimization

Machine Learning 2017-04-18 v4

Abstract

We show that the average stability notion introduced by \cite{kearns1999algorithmic, bousquet2002stability} is invariant to data preconditioning, for a wide class of generalized linear models that includes most of the known exp-concave losses. In other words, when analyzing the stability rate of a given algorithm, we may assume the optimal preconditioning of the data. This implies that, at least from a statistical perspective, explicit regularization is not required in order to compensate for ill-conditioned data, which stands in contrast to a widely common approach that includes a regularization for analyzing the sample complexity of generalized linear models. Several important implications of our findings include: a) We demonstrate that the excess risk of empirical risk minimization (ERM) is controlled by the preconditioned stability rate. This immediately yields a relatively short and elegant proof for the fast rates attained by ERM in our context. b) We strengthen the recent bounds of \cite{hardt2015train} on the stability rate of the Stochastic Gradient Descent algorithm.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1601.04011,
  title  = {Average Stability is Invariant to Data Preconditioning. Implications to Exp-concave Empirical Risk Minimization},
  author = {Alon Gonen and Shai Shalev-Shwartz},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.04011},
  year   = {2017}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-22T12:30:21.689Z