Although modern neural networks often generalize to new combinations of familiar concepts, the conditions that enable such compositionality have long been an open question. In this work, we study the systematicity gap in visual question answering: the performance difference between reasoning on previously seen and unseen combinations of object attributes. To test, we introduce a novel diagnostic dataset, CLEVR-HOPE. We find that the systematicity gap is not reduced by increasing the quantity of training data, but is reduced by increasing the diversity of training data. In particular, our experiments suggest that the more distinct attribute type combinations are seen during training, the more systematic we can expect the resulting model to be.
@article{arxiv.2311.08695,
title = {Attribute Diversity Determines the Systematicity Gap in VQA},
author = {Ian Berlot-Attwell and Kumar Krishna Agrawal and A. Michael Carrell and Yash Sharma and Naomi Saphra},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08695},
year = {2024}
}