AtomiMed: Hierarchical Atomic Fact-Checking for Universal Clinical-Aware Medical Report Evaluation
Abstract
Traditional metrics for Medical Report Generation (MRG) predominantly rely on surface-level n-gram overlap, which fails to capture clinical factual accuracy and often overlooks catastrophic diagnostic errors. We address this fundamental limitation by proposing \textbf{AtomiMed}, a universal, modality-agnostic evaluation framework that decomposes complex medical narratives into a standardized, multi-level hierarchy of Atomic Clinical Facts, encompassing Disease-level entities and Attribute-level descriptors, including location, morphology, and severity. By implementing an Agentic Cross-Verification loop between ground-truth and predicted reports, AtomiMed simulates a multi-radiologist peer-review process to verify clinical consistency, thus enabling the decoupled assessment of diagnostic detection and descriptive accuracy. To facilitate standardized evaluation, we introduce \textbf{MRGEvalKit}, an open-source toolkit for automated hierarchical extraction, and curate \textbf{OmniMRG-Bench}, a comprehensive multi-modal benchmark covering X-ray, CT, MRI, and Ultrasound. Extensive experiments on multiple expert-annotated reader studies demonstrate that AtomiMed achieves significantly higher correlation with human radiologist judgment compared to traditional and model-based metrics. Our code are release at https://github.com/Venn2336/MRGEvalkit
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2606.31292,
title = {AtomiMed: Hierarchical Atomic Fact-Checking for Universal Clinical-Aware Medical Report Evaluation},
author = {Yuan Wang and Wanxing Chang and Songtao Jiang and Shujian Gao and Xiaotian Zhang and Ruifeng Yuan and Weiwei Cao and Bowen Shi and Ling Zhang and Zuozhu Liu and Jianpeng Zhang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.31292},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
11 pages, 4 figures