Large Language Models (LLMs) often produce factoid hallucinations - plausible yet incorrect answers. A common mitigation strategy is model alignment, which improves factual accuracy by training on curated (factual, non-factual) pairs. However, this approach often relies on a stronger model (e.g., GPT-4) or an external knowledge base to assess factual correctness that may not always be accessible. Addressing this, we propose Atomic Consistency Preference Optimization (ACPO), a self-supervised preference-tuning method that enhances factual accuracy without external supervision. ACPO leverages atomic consistency signals (i.e., the agreement of individual facts across multiple stochastic responses) to identify high- and low-quality data pairs for model alignment. Despite being fully self-supervised, ACPO outperforms the strong supervised alignment baseline by 1.95 points averaged across Phi-3 and Llama3 on the LongFact and BioGen datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in improving factual reliability without relying on external models or knowledge bases.
@article{arxiv.2505.09039,
title = {Atomic Consistency Preference Optimization for Long-Form Question Answering},
author = {Jingfeng Chen and Raghuveer Thirukovalluru and Junlin Wang and Kaiwei Luo and Bhuwan Dhingra},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09039},
year = {2025}
}