English

At Which Level Should We Extract? An Empirical Analysis on Extractive Document Summarization

Computation and Language 2020-10-27 v2

Abstract

Extractive methods have been proven effective in automatic document summarization. Previous works perform this task by identifying informative contents at sentence level. However, it is unclear whether performing extraction at sentence level is the best solution. In this work, we show that unnecessity and redundancy issues exist when extracting full sentences, and extracting sub-sentential units is a promising alternative. Specifically, we propose extracting sub-sentential units based on the constituency parsing tree. A neural extractive model which leverages the sub-sentential information and extracts them is presented. Extensive experiments and analyses show that extracting sub-sentential units performs competitively comparing to full sentence extraction under the evaluation of both automatic and human evaluations. Hopefully, our work could provide some inspiration of the basic extraction units in extractive summarization for future research.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2004.02664,
  title  = {At Which Level Should We Extract? An Empirical Analysis on Extractive Document Summarization},
  author = {Qingyu Zhou and Furu Wei and Ming Zhou},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.02664},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

To appear at COLING 2020

R2 v1 2026-06-23T14:41:02.392Z