English

Astrometric calibration and performance of the Dark Energy Camera

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics 2017-06-14 v1

Abstract

We characterize the ability of the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) to perform relative astrometry across its 500~Mpix, 3 deg^2 science field of view, and across 4 years of operation. This is done using internal comparisons of ~4x10^7 measurements of high-S/N stellar images obtained in repeat visits to fields of moderate stellar density, with the telescope dithered to move the sources around the array. An empirical astrometric model includes terms for: optical distortions; stray electric fields in the CCD detectors; chromatic terms in the instrumental and atmospheric optics; shifts in CCD relative positions of up to ~10 um when the DECam temperature cycles; and low-order distortions to each exposure from changes in atmospheric refraction and telescope alignment. Errors in this astrometric model are dominated by stochastic variations with typical amplitudes of 10-30 mas (in a 30 s exposure) and 5-10 arcmin coherence length, plausibly attributed to Kolmogorov-spectrum atmospheric turbulence. The size of these atmospheric distortions is not closely related to the seeing. Given an astrometric reference catalog at density ~0.7 arcmin^{-2}, e.g. from Gaia, the typical atmospheric distortions can be interpolated to 7 mas RMS accuracy (for 30 s exposures) with 1 arcmin coherence length for residual errors. Remaining detectable error contributors are 2-4 mas RMS from unmodelled stray electric fields in the devices, and another 2-4 mas RMS from focal plane shifts between camera thermal cycles. Thus the astrometric solution for a single DECam exposure is accurate to 3-6 mas (0.02 pixels, or 300 nm) on the focal plane, plus the stochastic atmospheric distortion.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1703.01679,
  title  = {Astrometric calibration and performance of the Dark Energy Camera},
  author = {G. M. Bernstein and R. Armstrong and A. A. Plazas and A. R. Walker and T. M. C. Abbott and S. Allam and K. Bechtol and A. Benoit-Lévy and D. Brooks and D. L. Burke and A. Carnero Rosell and M. Carrasco Kind and J. Carretero and C. E. Cunha and L. N. da Costa and D. L. DePoy and S. Desai and H. T. Diehl and T. F. Eifler and E. Fernandez and P. Fosalba and J. Frieman and J. García-Bellido and D. W. Gerdes and D. Gruen and R. A. Gruendl and J. Gschwend and G. Gutierrez and K. Honscheid and D. J. James and S. Kent and E. Krause and K. Kuehn and N. Kuropatkin and T. S. Li and M. A. G. Maia and M. March and J. L. Marshall and F. Menanteau and R. Miquel and R. L. C. Ogando and K. Reil and A. Roodman and E. S. Rykoff and E. Sanchez and V. Scarpine and R. Schindler and M. Schubnell and I. Sevilla-Noarbe and M. Smith and R. C. Smith and M. Soares-Santos and F. Sobreira and E. Suchyta and M. E. C. Swanson and G. Tarle},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.01679},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

Submitted to PASP