English

Asking for an extra photon in Higgs production at the LHC and beyond

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2016-07-12 v3 High Energy Physics - Experiment

Abstract

We study the inclusive production of a Higgs boson in association with a high-pTp_T photon at the LHC, detailing the leading-order features of the main processes contributing to the HγH\gamma final state. Requiring an extra hard photon in Higgs production upsets the cross-section hierarchy for the dominant channels. The HγH\gamma inclusive production comes mainly from photons radiated in vector-boson fusion (VBF), which accounts for about 2/3 of the total rate, for pTγ,j>30p_T^{\gamma,j} >30 GeV, at leading order. On the other hand, radiating a high-pTp_T photon in the main top-loop Higgs channel implies an extra parton in the final state, which suppresses the production rate by a further αS\alpha_S power. As a result, the HγH\gamma production via top loops at the LHC has rates comparable with the ones arising from either the HttˉH t\bar t production or the HW(Z)γHW(Z)\gamma associated production. Then, in order of decreasing cross section, comes the single-top-plus-Higgs channel, followed in turn by the heavy-flavor fusion processes bbˉHγb\bar b \to H\gamma and ccˉHγc\bar c \to H\gamma. The HγH\gamma production via electroweak loops has just a minor role. At larger c.m. energies, the HttˉγH t\bar t\gamma channel surpasses the total contribution of top-loop processes. In particular, requiring pTγ,j>30p_T^{\gamma,j} >30 GeV at S100\sqrt S \simeq 100 TeV, HttˉγH t\bar t\gamma accounts for about 1/41/4 of the inclusive HγH\gamma production at leading order, about half of the total being due to VBF production.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1601.03635,
  title  = {Asking for an extra photon in Higgs production at the LHC and beyond},
  author = {Emidio Gabrielli and Barbara Mele and Fulvio Piccinini and Roberto Pittau},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.03635},
  year   = {2016}
}

Comments

20 pages, 13 figures, two comments added; one typo corrected; version published in JHEP