This study evaluates AV-HuBERT's perceptual bio-fidelity by benchmarking its response to incongruent audiovisual stimuli (McGurk effect) against human observers (N=44). Results reveal a striking quantitative isomorphism: AI and humans exhibited nearly identical auditory dominance rates (32.0% vs. 31.8%), suggesting the model captures biological thresholds for auditory resistance. However, AV-HuBERT showed a deterministic bias toward phonetic fusion (68.0%), significantly exceeding human rates (47.7%). While humans displayed perceptual stochasticity and diverse error profiles, the model remained strictly categorical. Findings suggest that current self-supervised architectures mimic multisensory outcomes but lack the neural variability inherent to human speech perception.
@article{arxiv.2601.15869,
title = {Artificial Rigidities vs. Biological Noise: A Comparative Analysis of Multisensory Integration in AV-HuBERT and Human Observers},
author = {Francisco Portillo López},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.15869},
year = {2026}
}