English

Are there infinitely many decompositions of the nucleon spin ?

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2015-06-15 v3 High Energy Physics - Experiment Nuclear Theory

Abstract

We discuss the uniqueness or non-uniqueness problem of the decomposition of the gluon field into the physical and pure-gauge components, which is the basis of the recently proposed two physically inequivalent gauge-invariant decompositions of the nucleon spin. It is crucialy important to recognize the fact that the standard gauge fixing procedure is essentially a process of projecting out the physical components of the massless gauge field. A complexity of the nonabelian gauge theory as compared with the abelian case is that a closed expression for the physical component can be given only with use of the non-local Wilson line, which is generally path-dependent. It is known that, by choosing an infinitely long straight-line path in space and time, the direction of which is characterized by a constant 4-vector nμn^\mu, one can cover a class of gauge called the general axial gauge, containing three popular gauges, i.e. the temporal, the light-cone, and the spatial axial gauge. Within this general axial gauge, we have calculated the 1-loop evolution matrix for the quark and gluon longitudinal spins in the nucleon. We found that the final answer is exactly the same independently of the choices of nμn^\mu, which amounts to proving the gauge-independence and path-independence simultaneously, although within a restricted class of gauges and paths. By drawing on all of these findings together with well-established knowledge from gauge theories, we argue against the rapidly spreading view in the community that there are infinitely many decompositions of the nucleon spin.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1302.5152,
  title  = {Are there infinitely many decompositions of the nucleon spin ?},
  author = {Masashi Wakamatsu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.5152},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

37 pages, 5 figures, Version to appear in Physical Review D. The logic of the whole argument in the paper was drastically changed. The delicacy of the gauge-invariant but the path-dependent formulation of gauge theories is discussed in some detail