English

Are optically-selected QSO catalogs biased ?

Astrophysics 2009-10-30 v1

Abstract

A thorough study of QSO-galaxy correlations has been done on a region close to the North Galactic Pole using a complete subsample of the optically selected CFHT/MMT QSO survey and the galaxy catalog of Odewahn and Aldering (1995). Although a positive correlation between bright QSOs and galaxies is expected because of the magnification bias effect, none is detected. On the contrary, there is a significant (>99.6%) anticorrelation between z<1.6 QSOs and red galaxies on rather large angular distances. This anticorrelation is much less pronounced for high redshift z>1.6 QSOs, which seems to exclude dust as a cause of the QSO underdensity. This result suggests that the selection process employed in the CFHT/MMT QSO survey is losing up to 50% of low redshift z<1.6 QSOs in regions of high galaxy density. The incompleteness in the whole z<1.6 QSO sample may reach 10% and have important consequences in the estimation of QSO evolution and the QSO autocorrelation function.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.astro-ph/9707153,
  title  = {Are optically-selected QSO catalogs biased ?},
  author = {I. Ferreras and N. Benitez and E. Martinez-Gonzalez},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:astro-ph/9707153},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

17 pages LaTeX (aasms4), plus 6 EPS figures. To be published in the Astronomical Journal