Pulmonary embolism is a leading cause of out of hospital cardiac arrest that requires fast diagnosis. While computed tomography pulmonary angiography is the standard diagnostic tool, it is not always accessible. Electrocardiography is an essential tool for diagnosing multiple cardiac anomalies, as it is affordable, fast and available in many settings. However, the availability of public ECG datasets, specially for PE, is limited and, in practice, these datasets tend to be small, making it essential to optimize learning strategies. In this study, we investigate the performance of multiple neural networks in order to assess the impact of various approaches. Moreover, we check whether these practices enhance model generalization when transfer learning is used to translate information learned in larger ECG datasets, such as PTB-XL, CPSC18 and MedalCare-XL, to a smaller, more challenging dataset for PE. By leveraging transfer learning, we analyze the extent to which we can improve learning efficiency and predictive performance on limited data. Code available at https://github.com/joaodsmarques/Are-ECGs-enough-Deep-Learning-Classifiers .
@article{arxiv.2503.08960,
title = {Are ECGs enough? Deep learning classification of pulmonary embolism using electrocardiograms},
author = {Joao D. S. Marques and Arlindo L. Oliveira},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08960},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
Accepted to the MIRASOL 2025 Workshop (MICCAI 2025)