English

Approximation in the Zygmund and H\"older classes on $\mathbb{R}^n$

Classical Analysis and ODEs 2021-11-17 v3

Abstract

We determine the distance (up to a multiplicative constant) in the Zygmund class Λ(Rn)\Lambda_{\ast}(\mathbb{R}^n) to the subspace J(bmo)(Rn).\mathrm{J}(\mathbf{bmo})(\mathbb{R}^n). The latter space is the image under the Bessel potential J:=(1Δ)1/2J := (1-\Delta)^{-1/2} of the space bmo(Rn),\mathbf{bmo}(\mathbb{R}^n), which is a non-homogeneous version of the classical BMO.\mathrm{BMO}. Locally, J(bmo)(Rn)\mathrm{J}(\mathbf{bmo})(\mathbb{R}^n) consists of functions that together with their first derivatives are in bmo(Rn).\mathbf{bmo}(\mathbb{R}^n). More generally, we consider the same question when the Zygmund class is replaced by the H\"older space Λs(Rn),\Lambda_{s}(\mathbb{R}^n), with 0<s10 < s \leq 1 and the corresponding subspace is Js(bmo)(Rn),\mathrm{J}_{s}(\mathbf{bmo})(\mathbb{R}^n), the image under (1Δ)s/2(1-\Delta)^{-s/2} of bmo(Rn).\mathbf{bmo}(\mathbb{R}^n). One should note here that Λ1(Rn)=Λ(Rn).\Lambda_{1}(\mathbb{R}^n) = \Lambda_{\ast}(\mathbb{R}^n). Such results were known earlier only for n=s=1n = s = 1 with a proof that does not extend to the general case. Our results are expressed in terms of second differences. As a byproduct of our wavelet based proof, we also obtain the distance from fΛs(Rn)f \in \Lambda_{s}(\mathbb{R}^n) to Js(bmo)(Rn)\mathrm{J}_{s}(\mathbf{bmo})(\mathbb{R}^n) in terms of the wavelet coefficients of f.f. We additionally establish a third way to express this distance in terms of the size of the hyperbolic gradient of the harmonic extension of ff on the upper half-space R+n+1.\mathbb{R}^{n+1}_{+}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2009.09752,
  title  = {Approximation in the Zygmund and H\"older classes on $\mathbb{R}^n$},
  author = {Eero Saksman and Odí Soler i Gibert},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.09752},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

29 pages. Several modifications following the recommendations of the referees: correction of multiple typos, moving the explanation on the proof of Theorem 2 and the proof of Theorem 3 into a new section, and other minor changes to improve clarity. Accepted manuscript at Can. J. Math