Antimagic labelings of a complete graph
Abstract
In , Hartsfield and Ringel introduced antimagic graphs. Hartsfield and Ringel conjectured that every connected graph (and in particular, a tree) except is antimagic. In , Hefetz et al.\ raised two questions: Is every orientation of any simple connected undirected graph antimagic? and Given any undirected graph , does there exist an orientation of which is antimagic? They call such an orientation an {\it antimagic orientation} of . Recently, Bhavale provided an edge labeling for a given graph on vertices without isolated vertices. In this paper, using the labeling of Bhavale, we prove that a complete graph for is super antimagic as well as totally antimagic total graph. We also prove that there exists an antimagic orientation of for .
Cite
@article{arxiv.2506.15221,
title = {Antimagic labelings of a complete graph},
author = {Dr A. N. Bhavale},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15221},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
7 Pages