Answering Related Questions
Abstract
We introduce the meta-problem Sidestep for a problem , a metric over its inputs, and a map . A solution to Sidestep on an input of is a pair such that and is a correct answer to on input . This formalizes the notion of answering a related question (or sidestepping the question), for which we give some motivations, and compare it to the neighboring concepts of smoothed analysis, certified algorithms, planted problems, edition problems, and approximation algorithms. Informally, we call hardness radius the ``largest'' such that Sidestep is NP-hard. This framework calls for establishing the hardness radius of problems of interest for the relevant distances . We exemplify it with graph problems and two distances and (the edge edit distance) such that (resp. ) is the maximum degree (resp. number of edges) of the symmetric difference of and if these graphs are on the same vertex set, and otherwise. We show that the decision problems Independent Set, Clique, Vertex Cover, Coloring, Clique Cover have hardness radius for , and for , that Hamiltonian Cycle has hardness radius 0 for , and somewhere between and for , and that Dominating Set has hardness radius for . We leave several open questions.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2501.10633,
title = {Answering Related Questions},
author = {Édouard Bonnet},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.10633},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
20 pages, 2 figures