English

Analyticity of layer potentials and $L^{2}$ solvability of boundary value problems for divergence form elliptic equations with complex $L^{\infty}$ coefficients

Analysis of PDEs 2011-07-05 v1 Classical Analysis and ODEs

Abstract

We consider divergence form elliptic operators of the form L=\dvA(x)L=-\dv A(x)\nabla, defined in Rn+1={(x,t)Rn×R}R^{n+1} = \{(x,t)\in R^n \times R \}, n2n \geq 2, where the LL^{\infty} coefficient matrix AA is (n+1)×(n+1)(n+1)\times(n+1), uniformly elliptic, complex and tt-independent. We show that for such operators, boundedness and invertibility of the corresponding layer potential operators on L2(Rn)=L2(R+n+1)L^2(\mathbb{R}^{n})=L^2(\partial\mathbb{R}_{+}^{n+1}), is stable under complex, LL^{\infty} perturbations of the coefficient matrix. Using a variant of the TbTb Theorem, we also prove that the layer potentials are bounded and invertible on L2(Rn)L^2(\mathbb{R}^n) whenever A(x)A(x) is real and symmetric (and thus, by our stability result, also when AA is complex, AA0\Vert A-A^0\Vert_{\infty} is small enough and A0A^0 is real, symmetric, LL^{\infty} and elliptic). In particular, we establish solvability of the Dirichlet and Neumann (and Regularity) problems, with L2L^2 (resp. L˙12)\dot{L}^2_1) data, for small complex perturbations of a real symmetric matrix. Previously, L2L^2 solvability results for complex (or even real but non-symmetric) coefficients were known to hold only for perturbations of constant matrices (and then only for the Dirichlet problem), or in the special case that the coefficients Aj,n+1=0=An+1,jA_{j,n+1}=0=A_{n+1,j}, 1jn1\leq j\leq n, which corresponds to the Kato square root problem.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0705.0836,
  title  = {Analyticity of layer potentials and $L^{2}$ solvability of boundary value problems for divergence form elliptic equations with complex $L^{\infty}$ coefficients},
  author = {M. Alfonseca and P. Auscher and A. Axelsson and S. Hofmann and S. Kim},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0705.0836},
  year   = {2011}
}