English

Analysis of Mesh Effects on Turbulent Flow Statistics

Numerical Analysis 2019-04-24 v2

Abstract

Turbulence models, such as the Smagorinsky model herein, are used to represent the energy lost from resolved to under-resolved scales due to the energy cascade (i.e. non-linearity). Analytic estimates of the energy dissipation rates of a few turbulence models have recently appeared, but none (yet) study energy dissipation restricted to resolved scales, i.e. after spacial discretization with h>h > micro scale. We do so herein for the Smagorinsky model. Upper bounds are derived on the \textit{computed} time-averaged energy dissipation rate, ε(uh)\langle \varepsilon (u^h)\rangle, for an under-resolved mesh hh for turbulent shear flow. For coarse mesh size O(Re1)<h<L \mathcal{O}(\mathcal{Re}^{-1}) < h < L , it is proven, ε(uh)[(Csδh)2+L5(Csδ)4h+L52(Csδ)4h32]U3L, \langle \varepsilon (u^h)\rangle\leq \big[ (\frac{C_s\, \delta}{h})^2+ \frac{L^5}{(C_s \delta)^4\,h}+\frac{L^{\frac{5}{2}}}{(C_s\, \delta)^{4}}\, {h^{\frac{3}{2}}}\big]\, \frac{U^3}{L}, where UU and LL are global velocity and length scale and CsC_s and δ\delta are model parameters. This upper bound is independent of the viscosity at high Reynolds number, is in accord with the scaling theory of turbulent. This estimate suggests over-dissipation for any of Cs>0C_s>0 and δ>0\delta>0, consistent with numerical evidence on the effects of model viscosity (without wall damping function). Moreover, the analysis indicates that the turbulent boundary layer is a more important length scale for shear flow than the Kolmogorov microscale.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1804.00745,
  title  = {Analysis of Mesh Effects on Turbulent Flow Statistics},
  author = {Ali Pakzad},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.00745},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

21 pages, 11 Figures

R2 v1 2026-06-23T01:12:07.297Z