To ensure trust in AI models, it is becoming increasingly apparent that evaluation of models must be extended beyond traditional performance metrics, like accuracy, to other dimensions, such as fairness, explainability, adversarial robustness, and distribution shift. We describe an empirical study to evaluate multiple model types on various metrics along these dimensions on several datasets. Our results show that no particular model type performs well on all dimensions, and demonstrate the kinds of trade-offs involved in selecting models evaluated along multiple dimensions.
@article{arxiv.2109.14653,
title = {An Empirical Study of Accuracy, Fairness, Explainability, Distributional Robustness, and Adversarial Robustness},
author = {Moninder Singh and Gevorg Ghalachyan and Kush R. Varshney and Reginald E. Bryant},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.14653},
year = {2021}
}