English

An Empirical Analysis of Multiple-Turn Reasoning Strategies in Reading Comprehension Tasks

Computation and Language 2017-11-10 v1

Abstract

Reading comprehension (RC) is a challenging task that requires synthesis of information across sentences and multiple turns of reasoning. Using a state-of-the-art RC model, we empirically investigate the performance of single-turn and multiple-turn reasoning on the SQuAD and MS MARCO datasets. The RC model is an end-to-end neural network with iterative attention, and uses reinforcement learning to dynamically control the number of turns. We find that multiple-turn reasoning outperforms single-turn reasoning for all question and answer types; further, we observe that enabling a flexible number of turns generally improves upon a fixed multiple-turn strategy. %across all question types, and is particularly beneficial to questions with lengthy, descriptive answers. We achieve results competitive to the state-of-the-art on these two datasets.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1711.03230,
  title  = {An Empirical Analysis of Multiple-Turn Reasoning Strategies in Reading Comprehension Tasks},
  author = {Yelong Shen and Xiaodong Liu and Kevin Duh and Jianfeng Gao},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.03230},
  year   = {2017}
}