An Elementary Approach to Containment Relations Between Symbolic and Ordinary Powers of Certain Monomial Ideals
Abstract
The purpose of this note is to find an elemenary explanation of a surprising result of Ein--Lazarsfeld--Smith \cite{ELS} and Hochster--Huneke \cite{HH} on the containment between symbolic and ordinary powers of ideals in simple cases. This line of research has been very active ever since, see for instance \cites{BC,HaH,DST} and the references therein, by now the literature on this topic is quite extensive. By `elementary' we refer to arguments that among others do not make use of resolution of singularities and multiplier ideals nor tight closure methods. Let us quickly recall the statement \cite{ELS}: let be a smooth projective variety of dimension , a non-zero sheaf of radical ideals with zero scheme ; if every irreducible component of has codimension at least , then for all . Our goal is to reprove this assertion in the case of points in projective spaces (as asked in \cite{PAGII}*{Example 11.3.5}) without recurring to deep methods of algebraic geometry. Instead of working with subsets of projective space, we will concentrate on the affine cones over them; our aim hence becomes to understand symbolic and ordinary powers ideals of sets of line through the origin. We will end up reducing the general case to a study of the ideals defining the union of coordinate axes in . We work over an arbitrary field . Our main result is as follows. Let be a set of points not lying in a hyperplane. Then for all positive integers . If , then the same statement holds for three distinct points in arbitrary position.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1512.07092,
title = {An Elementary Approach to Containment Relations Between Symbolic and Ordinary Powers of Certain Monomial Ideals},
author = {Ryan W. Keane and Alex Küronya and Elise McMahon},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.07092},
year = {2015}
}
Comments
5 pages