An Algorithmic Theory of Integer Programming
Abstract
We study the general integer programming problem where the number of variables is a variable part of the input. We consider two natural parameters of the constraint matrix : its numeric measure and its sparsity measure . We show that integer programming can be solved in time , where is some computable function of the parameters and , and is the binary encoding length of the input. In particular, integer programming is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by and , and is solvable in polynomial time for every fixed and . Our results also extend to nonlinear separable convex objective functions. Moreover, for linear objectives, we derive a strongly-polynomial algorithm, that is, with running time , independent of the rest of the input data. We obtain these results by developing an algorithmic framework based on the idea of iterative augmentation: starting from an initial feasible solution, we show how to quickly find augmenting steps which rapidly converge to an optimum. A central notion in this framework is the Graver basis of the matrix , which constitutes a set of fundamental augmenting steps. The iterative augmentation idea is then enhanced via the use of other techniques such as new and improved bounds on the Graver basis, rapid solution of integer programs with bounded variables, proximity theorems and a new proximity-scaling algorithm, the notion of a reduced objective function, and others. As a consequence of our work, we advance the state of the art of solving block-structured integer programs. In particular, we develop near-linear time algorithms for -fold, tree-fold, and -stage stochastic integer programs. We also discuss some of the many applications of these classes.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1904.01361,
title = {An Algorithmic Theory of Integer Programming},
author = {Friedrich Eisenbrand and Christoph Hunkenschröder and Kim-Manuel Klein and Martin Koutecký and Asaf Levin and Shmuel Onn},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.01361},
year = {2022}
}
Comments
Revision 3: - corrections to specified complexities (infinite bounds, feasibility, etc.)