English

Alternative Methylated Biosignatures I: Methyl Bromide, A Capstone Biosignature

Earth and Planetary Astrophysics 2022-10-17 v2

Abstract

The first potential exoplanet biosignature detections are likely to be ambiguous due to the potential for false positives: abiotic planetary processes that produce observables similar to those anticipated from a global biosphere. Here we propose a class of methylated gases as corroborative `capstone' biosignatures. Capstone biosignatures are metabolic products that may be less immediately detectable, but have substantially lower false positive potential, and can thus serve as confirmation for a primary biosignature such as O2_2. CH3_3Cl has previously been established as a biosignature candidate, and other halomethane gases such as CH3_3Br and CH3_3I have similar potential. These gases absorb in the mid infrared at wavelengths that are likely to be captured while observing primary biosignatures such as O3_3 or CH4_4. We quantitatively explore CH3_3Br as a new capstone biosignature through photochemical and spectral modeling of Earth-like planets orbiting FGKM stellar hosts. We also re-examine the biosignature potential of CH3_3Cl over the same set of parameters using our updated model. We show that CH3_3Cl and CH3_3Br can build up to relatively high levels in M dwarf environments and analyze synthetic spectra of TRAPPIST-1e. Our results suggest that there is a co-additive spectral effect from multiple CH3_3X gases in an atmosphere, leading to increased signal-to-noise and greater ability to detect a methylated gas feature. These capstone biosignatures are plausibly detectable in exoplanetary atmospheres, have low false positive potential, and would provide strong evidence for life in conjunction with other well established biosignature candidates.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2208.07393,
  title  = {Alternative Methylated Biosignatures I: Methyl Bromide, A Capstone Biosignature},
  author = {Michaela Leung and Edward W. Schwieterman and Mary N. Parenteau and Thomas J. Fauchez},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07393},
  year   = {2022}
}

Comments

18 pages, 11 figures, appendix. Published in ApJ