Alternating knots do not admit cosmetic crossings
Abstract
By examining the homology groups of a 4-manifold associated to an integral surgery on a knot in a rational homology 3-sphere yielding a rational homology 3-sphere with surgery dual knot , we show that the subgroups generated by and in and , respectively, have co-prime orders. We obtain an immediate corollary that, in conjunction with an argument of Lidman and Moore, proves the cosmetic crossing conjecture for knots whose branched double covers are Heegaard Floer L-spaces.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2112.10980,
title = {Alternating knots do not admit cosmetic crossings},
author = {Jacob Caudell},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10980},
year = {2022}
}
Comments
There is an error in the proof of the co-primality statement in Proposition 6. The author has constructed examples of knots with integer surgeries so that the orders of the groups generated by these knots and their surgery duals have a non-trivial common factor, so in fact the co-primality statement in Proposition 6 is false