English

AI-Assisted Goal Setting Improves Goal Progress Through Social Accountability

Human-Computer Interaction 2026-03-19 v1 Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Helping people identify and pursue personally meaningful career goals at scale remains a key challenge in applied psychology. Career coaching can improve goal quality and attainment, but its cost and limited availability restrict access. Large language model (LLM)-based chatbots offer a scalable alternative, yet the psychological mechanisms by which they might support goal pursuit remain untested. Here we report a preregistered three-arm randomised controlled trial (N = 517) comparing an AI career coach ("Leon," powered by Claude Sonnet), a matched structured written questionnaire covering closely matched reflective topics, and a no-support control on goal progress at a two-week follow-up. The AI chatbot produced significantly higher goal progress than the control (d = 0.33, p = .016). Compared with the written-reflection condition, the AI did not significantly improve overall goal progress, but it increased perceived social accountability. In the preregistered mediation model, perceived accountability mediated the AI-over-questionnaire effect on goal progress (indirect effect = 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.31]), whereas self-concordance did not. These findings suggest that AI-assisted goal setting can improve short-term goal progress, and that its clearest added value over structured self-reflection lies in increasing felt accountability.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2603.17887,
  title  = {AI-Assisted Goal Setting Improves Goal Progress Through Social Accountability},
  author = {Michel Schimpf and Julian Voigt and Thomas Bohné},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.17887},
  year   = {2026}
}
R2 v1 2026-07-01T11:26:29.644Z