Agentic Workflows for Resolving Conflict Over Shared Resources: A Power Grid Application
Abstract
The increasing use of LLM-based agents to support decision-making and control across diverse domains motivates the need for systematic deconfliction of their proposed actions. We present a deconfliction framework for coordinating multiple agents that formally encapsulate individual applications, each proposing potentially conflicting actions over shared resources. Conflicts are resolved through three deconfliction modes: bilateral negotiation, structured mediation, and procedural (deterministic) deconfliction. We define design principles for large language model-based client agents, including a chain-of-thought style reasoning process, and introduce an iterative weighted-consensus mechanism that does not require the applications themselves to solve optimization problems. The framework is domain agnostic and supports both numeric and non-numeric decisions. Its performance is demonstrated on a power distribution use case with conflicting advanced distribution management system applications for cost optimization and resilience, coordinating diesel generators and battery energy storage systems.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2604.09823,
title = {Agentic Workflows for Resolving Conflict Over Shared Resources: A Power Grid Application},
author = {Shiva Poudel and Thiagarajan Ramachandran and Orestis Vasios and Andrew P. Reiman},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.09823},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
6 pages, 9 figures