English

Accurate Effective-One-Body waveforms of inspiralling and coalescing black-hole binaries

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology 2008-11-26 v2

Abstract

The Effective-One-Body (EOB) formalism contains several flexibility parameters, notably a5a_5, \vp\vp and \a\a. We show here how to jointly constrain the values of these parameters by simultaneously best-fitting the EOB waveform to two, independent, numerical relativity (NR) simulations of inspiralling and/or coalescing binary black hole systems: published Caltech-Cornell {\it inspiral} data (considered for gravitational wave frequencies Mω0.1M\omega\leq 0.1) on one side, and newly computed {\it coalescence} data on the other side. The resulting, approximately unique, "best-fit" EOB waveform is then shown to exhibit excellent agreement with NR coalescence data for several mass ratios. The dephasing between this best-fit EOB waveform and published Caltech-Cornell inspiral data is found to vary between -0.0014 and +0.0008 radians over a time span of 2464M\sim 2464M up to gravitational wave frequency Mω=0.1M\omega= 0.1, and between +0.0013 and -0.0185 over a time span of 96M after Mω=0.1M\omega=0.1 up to Mω=0.1565M\omega=0.1565. The dephasings between EOB and the new coalescence data are found to be smaller than: (i) ±0.025\pm 0.025 radians over a time span of 730M (11 cycles) up to merger, in the equal mass case, and (ii) ±0.05\pm 0.05 radians over a time span of about 950M (17 cycles) up to merger in the 2:1 mass-ratio case. These new results corroborate the aptitude of the EOB formalism to provide accurate representations of general relativistic waveforms, which are needed by currently operating gravitational wave detectors.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0803.3162,
  title  = {Accurate Effective-One-Body waveforms of inspiralling and coalescing black-hole binaries},
  author = {Thibault Damour and Alessandro Nagar and Mark Hannam and Sascha Husa and Bernd Brugmann},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0803.3162},
  year   = {2008}
}

Comments

25 pages, 15 figures. Improved discussion about errors on numerical relativity data. Version published in Phys. Rev. D