English

A symmetry breaking phenomenon for anisotropic harmonic maps from a 2D annulus into $\mathbb S^1$

Analysis of PDEs 2024-09-10 v2

Abstract

In a two dimensional annulus Aρ={xR2:ρ<x<1}A_\rho=\{x\in \mathbb R^2: \rho<|x|<1\}, ρ(0,1)\rho\in (0,1), we characterize 00-homogeneous minimizers, in H1(Aρ;S1)H^1(A_\rho;\mathbb S^1) with respect to their own boundary conditions, of the anisotropic energy \begin{equation*} E_\delta(u)=\int_{A_\rho} |\nabla u|^2 +\delta \left( (\nabla\cdot u)^2-(\nabla\times u)^2\right) \, dx,\quad \delta\in (-1,1). \end{equation*} Even for a small anisotropy 0<δ10<|\delta|\ll 1, we exhibit qualitative properties very different from the isotropic case δ=0\delta=0. In particular, 00-homogeneous critical points of degree d{0,1,2}d\notin \lbrace 0,1,2\rbrace are always local minimizers, but in thick annuli (ρ1\rho\ll 1) they are not minimizers: the 00-homogeneous symmetry is broken. One corollary is that entire solutions to the anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau system have a far-field behavior very different from the isotropic case studied by Brezis, Merle and Rivi\`ere. The tools we use include: ODE and variational arguments; asymptotic expansions, interpolation inequalities and explicit computations involving near-optimizers of these inequalities for proving that 00-homogeneous critical points are not minimizers in thick annuli.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2311.15758,
  title  = {A symmetry breaking phenomenon for anisotropic harmonic maps from a 2D annulus into $\mathbb S^1$},
  author = {Andres Contreras and Xavier Lamy},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15758},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

The third item in Theorem 1.1 is wrong. Minimality of the homogeneous critical point follows from calculations in an upcoming work by P. Bauman and D. Phillips