A Second Look at 12 Candidate Dual AGNs using ${\tt BAYMAX}$
Abstract
We present an analysis of 12 optically selected dual AGN candidates at . Each candidate was originally identified via double-peaked [O III] 5007 emission lines, and have received follow-up and observations. Because the X-ray data are low-count ( counts) with small separations ("), a robust analysis is necessary for classifying each source. Pairing long-slit [O III] observations with existing observations, we re-analyze the X-ray observations with to determine whether the X-ray emission from each system is more likely a single or dual point source. We find that 4 of the 12 sources are likely dual X-ray point source systems. We examine each point source's spectra via a Monte Carlo method that probabilistically identifies the likely origin of each photon. When doing so, we find that (i) the secondary X-ray point sources in 2 of the systems have erg s, such that we cannot rule out a non-AGN origin, (ii) one source has a secondary with erg s but a spectrum that is too soft to definitively preclude being X-ray emitting diffuse gas that was photoionized by the primary AGN, and (iii) one system (SDSS J1126+2944) is a dual AGN. Additionally, using complementary observations, we analyze a sub-sample of systems that are visually identified as merging. Our results suggest that dual AGNs may preferentially reside in mergers with small separations, consistent with both simulations and observations.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2002.01033,
title = {A Second Look at 12 Candidate Dual AGNs using ${\tt BAYMAX}$},
author = {Adi Foord and Kayhan Gültekin and Rebecca Nevin and Julia M. Comerford and Edmund Hodges-Kluck and R. Scott Barrows and Andrew D. Goulding and Jenny E. Greene},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.01033},
year = {2020}
}
Comments
26 pages, 9 figures, accepted to ApJ