English

A Note on Multiparty Communication Complexity and the Hales-Jewett Theorem

Computational Complexity 2018-07-03 v2 Combinatorics

Abstract

For integers nn and kk, the density Hales-Jewett number cn,kc_{n,k} is defined as the maximal size of a subset of [k]n[k]^n that contains no combinatorial line. We show that for k3k \ge 3 the density Hales-Jewett number cn,kc_{n,k} is equal to the maximal size of a cylinder intersection in the problem Partn,kPart_{n,k} of testing whether kk subsets of [n][n] form a partition. It follows that the communication complexity, in the Number On the Forehead (NOF) model, of Partn,kPart_{n,k}, is equal to the minimal size of a partition of [k]n[k]^n into subsets that do not contain a combinatorial line. Thus, the bound in \cite{chattopadhyay2007languages} on Partn,kPart_{n,k} using the Hales-Jewett theorem is in fact tight, and the density Hales-Jewett number can be thought of as a quantity in communication complexity. This gives a new angle to this well studied quantity. As a simple application we prove a lower bound on cn,kc_{n,k}, similar to the lower bound in \cite{polymath2010moser} which is roughly cn,k/knexp(O(logn)1/log2k)c_{n,k}/k^n \ge \exp(-O(\log n)^{1/\lceil \log_2 k\rceil}). This lower bound follows from a protocol for Partn,kPart_{n,k}. It is interesting to better understand the communication complexity of Partn,kPart_{n,k} as this will also lead to the better understanding of the Hales-Jewett number. The main purpose of this note is to motivate this study.

Cite

@article{arxiv.1706.02277,
  title  = {A Note on Multiparty Communication Complexity and the Hales-Jewett Theorem},
  author = {Adi Shraibman},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02277},
  year   = {2018}
}
R2 v1 2026-06-22T20:12:08.925Z