English

A new perspective on turbulent Galactic magnetic fields through comparison of linear polarisation decomposition techniques

Astrophysics of Galaxies 2017-05-03 v1

Abstract

We compare two rotationally invariant decomposition techniques on linear polarisation data: the spin-2 spherical harmonic decomposition in two opposite parities, the EE- and BB-mode, and the multiscale analysis of the gradient of linear polarisation, P|\nabla \mathbf{P}|. We demonstrate that both decompositions have similar properties in the image domain and the spatial frequency domain. They can be used as complementary tools for turbulence analysis of interstellar magnetic fields in order to develop a better understanding of the origin of energy sources for the turbulence, the origin of peculiar magnetic field structures and their underlying physics. We also introduce a new quantity EB|\nabla EB| based on the EE- and BB-modes and we show that in the intermediate and small scales limit EBP|\nabla EB| \simeq |\nabla \mathbf{P}|. Analysis of the 2.3 GHz S-band Polarization All Sky Survey (S -PASS) shows many extended coherent filament-like features appearing as 'double-jumps' in the P|\nabla \mathbf{P}| map that are correlated with negative and positive filaments of BB-type polarisation. These local asymmetries between the two polarisation types, EE and BB, of the non-thermal Galactic synchrotron emission have an influence on the EE- and BB-mode power spectra analyses. The wavelet-based formalism of the polarisation gradient analysis allows us to locate the position of EE- or BB-mode features responsible for the local asymmetries between the two polarisation types. In analysed subregions, the perturbations of the magnetic field are trigged by star clusters associated with HII regions, the Orion-Eridanus superbubble and the North Polar Spur at low Galactic latitude.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1703.04469,
  title  = {A new perspective on turbulent Galactic magnetic fields through comparison of linear polarisation decomposition techniques},
  author = {J. -F. Robitaille and A. M. M. Scaife and E. Carretti and B. M. Gaensler and J. D. McEwen and B. Leistedt and M. Haverkorn and G. Bernardi and M. J. Kesteven and S. Poppi and L. Staveley-Smith},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.04469},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

Accepted for publication on MNRAS (2017 March 10), 20 pages, 14 figures