A Large Scale Benchmark for Test Time Adaptation Methods in Medical Image Segmentation
Abstract
Test time Adaptation is a promising approach for mitigating domain shift in medical image segmentation; however, current evaluations remain limited in terms of modality coverage, task diversity, and methodological consistency. We present MedSeg-TTA, a comprehensive benchmark that examines twenty representative adaptation methods across seven imaging modalities, including MRI, CT, ultrasound, pathology, dermoscopy, OCT, and chest X-ray, under fully unified data preprocessing, backbone configuration, and test time protocols. The benchmark encompasses four significant adaptation paradigms: Input-level Transformation, Feature-level Alignment, Output-level Regularization, and Prior Estimation, enabling the first systematic cross-modality comparison of their reliability and applicability. The results show that no single paradigm performs best in all conditions. Input-level methods are more stable under mild appearance shifts. Feature-level and Output-level methods offer greater advantages in boundary-related metrics, whereas prior-based methods exhibit strong modality dependence. Several methods degrade significantly under large inter-center and inter-device shifts, which highlights the importance of principled method selection for clinical deployment. MedSeg-TTA provides standardized datasets, validated implementations, and a public leaderboard, establishing a rigorous foundation for future research on robust, clinically reliable test-time adaptation. All source codes and open-source datasets are available at https://github.com/wenjing-gg/MedSeg-TTA.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2512.02497,
title = {A Large Scale Benchmark for Test Time Adaptation Methods in Medical Image Segmentation},
author = {Wenjing Yu and Shuo Jiang and Yifei Chen and Shuo Chang and Yuanhan Wang and Beining Wu and Jie Dong and Mingxuan Liu and Shenghao Zhu and Feiwei Qin and Changmiao Wang and Qiyuan Tian},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02497},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
45 pages, 18 figures