English

A heuristic use of dynamic programming to upperbound treewidth

Data Structures and Algorithms 2019-10-25 v2

Abstract

For a graph GG, let Π(G)\Pi(G) denote the set of all potential maximal cliques of GG. For each subset Π\Pi of Π(G)\Pi(G), let \tw(G,Π)\tw(G, \Pi) denote the smallest kk such that there is a tree-decomposition of GG of width kk whose bags all belong to Π\Pi. Bouchitt\'{e} and Todinca observed in 2001 that \tw(G,Π(G))\tw(G, \Pi(G)) is exactly the treewidth of GG and developed a dynamic programming algorithm to compute it. Indeed, their algorithm can readily be applied to an arbitrary non-empty subset Π\Pi of Π(G)\Pi(G) and computes \tw(G,Π)\tw(G, \Pi), or reports that it is undefined, in time ΠV(G)O(1)|\Pi||V(G)|^{O(1)}. This efficient tool for computing \tw(G,Π)\tw(G, \Pi) allows us to conceive of an iterative improvement procedure for treewidth upper bounds which maintains, as the current solution, a set of potential maximal cliques rather than a tree-decomposition. We design and implement an algorithm along this approach. Experiments show that our algorithm vastly outperforms previously implemented heuristic algorithms for treewidth.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1909.07647,
  title  = {A heuristic use of dynamic programming to upperbound treewidth},
  author = {Hisao Tamaki},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.07647},
  year   = {2019}
}

Comments

14 pages, 2 tables. In v2, some typographical errors, as well as an incorrect statement in Proposition 3.6, are fixed

R2 v1 2026-06-23T11:17:36.497Z