A Heterogeneous Long-Micro Scale Cascading Architecture for General Aviation Health Management
Abstract
BACKGROUND: General aviation fleet expansion demands intelligent health monitoring under computational constraints. Real-world aircraft health diagnosis requires balancing accuracy with computational constraints under extreme class imbalance and environmental uncertainty. Existing end-to-end approaches suffer from the receptive field paradox: global attention introduces excessive operational heterogeneity noise for fine-grained fault classification, while localized constraints sacrifice critical cross-temporal context essential for anomaly detection. METHODS: This paper presents an AI-driven heterogeneous cascading architecture for general aviation health management. The proposed Long-Micro Scale Diagnostician (LMSD) explicitly decouples global anomaly detection (full-sequence attention) from micro-scale fault classification (restricted receptive fields), resolving the receptive field paradox while minimizing training overhead. A knowledge distillation-based interpretability module provides physically traceable explanations for safety-critical validation. RESULTS: Experiments on the public National General Aviation Flight Information Database (NGAFID) dataset (28,935 flights, 36 categories) demonstrate 4--8% improvement in safety-critical metrics (MCWPM) with 4.2 times training acceleration and 46% model compression compared to end-to-end baselines. CONCLUSIONS: The AI-driven heterogeneous architecture offers deployable solutions for aviation equipment health management, with potential for digital twin integration in future work. The proposed framework substantiates deployability in resource-constrained aviation environments while maintaining stringent safety requirements.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2603.22885,
title = {A Heterogeneous Long-Micro Scale Cascading Architecture for General Aviation Health Management},
author = {Xinhang Chen and Zhihuan Wei and Yang Hu and Zhiguo Zeng and Kang Zeng and Wei Wang},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.22885},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
Significant methodological flaws have been identified in the experimental validation and metric computation procedures that undermine the reliability of the reported results. A comprehensive revision is underway