English

A gap in the double white dwarf separation distribution caused by the common-envelope evolution: astrometric evidence from Gaia

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics 2022-06-29 v1 Astrophysics of Galaxies High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

Abstract

The trajectory of the center of light of an unresolved binary is different from that of its center of mass. Binary-induced stellar centroid wobbling can therefore be detected as an excess in the goodness-of-fit of the single-star astrometric model. We use reduced χ2\chi^2 of the astrometric fit in the {\it Gaia} Early Data Release 3 to detect the likely unresolved double white dwarfs (DWDs). Using parallax-based distances we convert the excess of reduced χ2\chi^2 into the amplitude of the centroid wobble δa\delta a, which is proportional to the binary separation aa. The measured δa\delta a distribution drops towards larger wobble amplitudes and shows a break around δa0.2\delta a \approx 0.2 where it steepens. The integral of the distribution yields DWD fraction of 6.5±3.76.5 \pm 3.7 per cent in the range 0.01<a(au)<20.01 < a (\text{au}) < 2. Using synthetic models of the Galactic DWDs we demonstrate that the break in the δa\delta a distribution corresponds to one side of a deep gap in the DWD separation distribution at around a1a\approx 1 au. Model DWDs with separations less than several au shrink dramatically due to (al least one) common envelope phase, reshaping the original separation distribution, clearing a gap and creating a pile-up of systems with a0.01a\approx 0.01 au and δa<0.01\delta a < 0.01. Our models reproduce the overall shape of the observed δa\delta a distribution and its normalisation, however the predicted drop in the numbers of DWDs beyond the break is steeper than in the data.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2203.03659,
  title  = {A gap in the double white dwarf separation distribution caused by the common-envelope evolution: astrometric evidence from Gaia},
  author = {Valeriya Korol and Vasily Belokurov and Silvia Toonen},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.03659},
  year   = {2022}
}

Comments

submitted to MNRAS main journal, comments are welcome