English

A Faster Algorithm for Max Cut in Dense Graphs

Data Structures and Algorithms 2021-12-21 v2

Abstract

We design an algorithm for approximating the size of \emph{Max Cut} in dense graphs. Given a proximity parameter ε(0,1)\varepsilon \in (0,1), our algorithm approximates the size of \emph{Max Cut} of a graph GG with nn vertices, within an additive error of εn2\varepsilon n^2, with sample complexity O(1ε3log21εloglog1ε)\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\varepsilon^3} \log^2 \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \log \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon}) and query complexity of O(1ε4log31εloglog1ε)\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\varepsilon^4} \log^3 \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \log \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon}). Since Goldreich, Goldwasser and Ron (JACM 98) gave the first algorithm with sample complexity O(1ε5log1ε)\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\varepsilon^5}\log \frac{1}{\varepsilon}) and query complexity of O(1ε7log21ε)\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\varepsilon^7}\log^2 \frac{1}{\varepsilon}), there have been several efforts employing techniques from diverse areas with a focus on improving the sample and query complexities. Our work makes the first improvement in the sample complexity as well as query complexity after more than a decade from the previous best results of Alon, Vega, Kannan and Karpinski (JCSS 03) and of Mathieu and Schudy (SODA 08) respectively, both with sample complexity O(1ε4log1ε)\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{{\varepsilon}^4}{\log}\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right). We also want to note that the best time complexity of this problem was by Alon, Vega, Karpinski and Kannan (JCSS 03). By combining their result with an approximation technique by Arora, Karger and Karpinski (STOC 95), they obtained an algorithm with time complexity of 2O(1ε2log1ε)2^{\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{{\varepsilon}^2} \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon})}. In this work, we have improved this further to 2O(1εlog1ε)2^{\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{\varepsilon} \log \frac{1}{\varepsilon} )}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2110.04574,
  title  = {A Faster Algorithm for Max Cut in Dense Graphs},
  author = {Arijit Ghosh and Gopinath Mishra and Rahul Raychaudhury and Sayantan Sen},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.04574},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

The proof of the main claim in the paper is incomplete, and because of this reason, we are withdrawing the paper

R2 v1 2026-06-24T06:45:41.775Z