English

A Dirichlet problem for the Laplace operator in a domain with a small hole close to the boundary

Analysis of PDEs 2017-10-25 v3 Numerical Analysis

Abstract

We study the Dirichlet problem in a domain with a small hole close to the boundary. To do so, for each pair ε=(ε1,ε2)\boldsymbol\varepsilon = (\varepsilon_1, \varepsilon_2 ) of positive parameters, we consider a perforated domain Ωε\Omega_{\boldsymbol\varepsilon} obtained by making a small hole of size ε1ε2\varepsilon_1 \varepsilon_2 in an open regular subset Ω\Omega of Rn\mathbb{R}^n at distance ε1\varepsilon_1 from the boundary Ω\partial\Omega. As ε10\varepsilon_1 \to 0, the perforation shrinks to a point and, at the same time, approaches the boundary. When ε(0,0)\boldsymbol\varepsilon \to (0,0), the size of the hole shrinks at a faster rate than its approach to the boundary. We denote by uεu_{\boldsymbol\varepsilon} the solution of a Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation in Ωε\Omega_{\boldsymbol\varepsilon}. For a space dimension n3n\geq 3, we show that the function mapping ε\boldsymbol\varepsilon to uεu_{\boldsymbol\varepsilon} has a real analytic continuation in a neighborhood of (0,0)(0,0). By contrast, for n=2n=2 we consider two different regimes: ε\boldsymbol\varepsilon tends to (0,0)(0,0), and ε1\varepsilon_1 tends to 00 with ε2\varepsilon_2 fixed. When ε(0,0)\boldsymbol\varepsilon\to(0,0), the solution uεu_{\boldsymbol\varepsilon} has a logarithmic behavior; when only ε10\varepsilon_1\to0 and ε2\varepsilon_2 is fixed, the asymptotic behavior of the solution can be described in terms of real analytic functions of ε1\varepsilon_1. We also show that for n=2n=2, the energy integral and the total flux on the exterior boundary have different limiting values in the two regimes. We prove these results by using functional analysis methods in conjunction with certain special layer potentials.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1612.05115,
  title  = {A Dirichlet problem for the Laplace operator in a domain with a small hole close to the boundary},
  author = {Virginie Bonnaillie-Noël and Matteo Dalla Riva and Marc Dambrine and Paolo Musolino},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.05115},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

combined with 1612.04637