English

A consistently adaptive trust-region method

Optimization and Control 2024-08-06 v1

Abstract

Adaptive trust-region methods attempt to maintain strong convergence guarantees without depending on conservative estimates of problem properties such as Lipschitz constants. However, on close inspection, one can show existing adaptive trust-region methods have theoretical guarantees with severely suboptimal dependence on problem properties such as the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian. For example, TRACE developed by Curtis et al. obtains a O(ΔfL3/2ϵ3/2)+O~(1)O(\Delta_f L^{3/2} \epsilon^{-3/2}) + \tilde{O}(1) iteration bound where LL is the Lipschitz constant of the Hessian. Compared with the optimal O(ΔfL1/2ϵ3/2)O(\Delta_f L^{1/2} \epsilon^{-3/2}) bound this is suboptimal with respect to LL. We present the first adaptive trust-region method which circumvents this issue and requires at most O(ΔfL1/2ϵ3/2)+O~(1)O( \Delta_f L^{1/2} \epsilon^{-3/2}) + \tilde{O}(1) iterations to find an ϵ\epsilon-approximate stationary point, matching the optimal iteration bound up to an additive logarithmic term. Our method is a simple variant of a classic trust-region method and in our experiments performs competitively with both ARC and a classical trust-region method.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2408.01874,
  title  = {A consistently adaptive trust-region method},
  author = {Fadi Hamad and Oliver Hinder},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.01874},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

This submission contains a fix for the Quadratic convergence proof under Appendix B (Proof of Theorem 2)

R2 v1 2026-06-28T18:03:14.536Z